Tuesday, July 18, 2023

Atom, and the Eve of Destruction [A #TBT Post]

Heading to your local theater to watch Christopher Nolan's latest epic movie, Oppenheimer? For your consideration, I present a quick refresher - or perhaps brand new information if you are unfamiliar with the subject - on the basic historical context of the upcoming film. [Note: Originally written by me for a now-defunct startup reference website in 2007, and titled, "Making the Atomic Bomb:  Alamogordo and the Road to Nuclear Armament." All grammatical and typographical errors have been left intact as originally written and formatted.]

    On July 16, 1945, the United States detonated the first atomic bomb near Alamogordo, New Mexico, at the Alamogordo Test Range. In an area of the Jornada del Muerto Valley designated Trinity Site, the successful test was the culmination of years of scientific research.
    Throughout the 1930s, politicians and scientists, spurred by new discoveries in atomic theory, debated the theoretical plausibility of an atomic bomb. By 1939, American and British scientists began investigating the creation of such a weapon, particularly in light of Germany’s alleged ambitions to develop a bomb of their own. That same year, physicists Leo Szilárd and Albert Einstein wrote a letter to President Franklin D. Roosevelt urging the United States to build the weapon before Germany. Working with several expatriate European scientists, the U.S. government prioritized its development.
    However, efforts did not move forward until 1942, when transferred under the authority of the U.S. Army as the Manhattan Project. The top military leader in charge, General Leslie R. Groves, oversaw all major aspects of the project at the three main facilities in Oak Ridge, Tennessee and Hanford, Washington, which manufactured the atomic materials, and Los Alamos, New Mexico, which served as the technical laboratory. Groves selected theoretical physicist J. Robert Oppenheimer for scientific director of the project, noting his scientific intellect, tactful manner, and previous work on several aspects of the bombs development prior to his appointment.
    Working out of the top-secret Los Alamos, Oppenheimer and his scientific teams focused on the design and material needed to create a nuclear chain reaction. In conjunction with such notables as Szilárd, who formulated the reaction concept in 1933, Enrico Fermi, and Niels Bohr, numerous scientists from around the country dedicated themselves to the project. They explored several concepts, with little practicality in their application. Confident a uranium-based bomb would work, two fission designs were proposed:  one utilizing enriched uranium and the other its newly discovered derivative plutonium.
    For the more complicated plutonium device, physicist Seth Neddermeyer, working off earlier proposals from others, posited the use of an “implosion technique”:  a ball of plutonium at the weapon’s core imploded to a supercritical state by conventional high explosives, setting off the desired chain reaction. Oppenheimer, seeing merit in the idea, shifted focus to its development. By July 1945, a team that included chemist George Kistiakowsky, mathematician John von Neumann, and physicists Robert Christy and Edward Teller, readied a device, nicknamed “the Gadget.”
    Due to uncertainties in its capabilities, Groves and Oppenheimer agreed it necessary to test the Gadgets’ military usability. Under a veil of secrecy and morning thunderstorms, the plutonium-based bomb was detonated at Trinity on July 16 at 5:29 a.m. local time. The result was an explosion equivalent to 19 kilotons of TNT, creating a crater 10 feet deep and over 1,000 feet wide. By all accounts, it illuminated the surrounding landscape brighter than daylight for a few brief seconds. The mushroom cloud caused by the explosion extended nearly eight miles into the sky, while the resulting shockwave traveled as far as 100 miles. Noting the accomplishment, Oppenheimer stated simply, “It worked.” (He would later recall reflecting privately on a passage in the Hindu scripture, Bhagavad Gita:  “Now, I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.”)
    President Harry S. Truman quickly authorized the use of the new weapon against Japan, whom the United States had been at war with for the past three and a half years. Truman’s top advisors, fearing major casualties in a proposed invasion of mainland Japan, concluded such action to be the best solution in ending hostilities between the two nations with minimal Allied losses. On August 6, a U.S. Army Air Force B-29 bomber, the Enola Gay, dropped the first of two bombs – the uranium-based “Little Boy” – on Hiroshima, Japan. Japan’s refusal to comply with surrender terms resulted in a second – similar in composition as the Trinity test bomb and codenamed “Fat Man” – being dropped on Nagasaki three days later. Due to the devastation caused, Japan formally surrendered to the Allies on August 15, 1945, ending World War II.
    Reactions to the bombings were immediate and mixed. While proponents celebrated the triumphal victory, critics questioned their necessity against an ostensibly defeated enemy. Some regarded them as unmitigated revenge for Pearl Harbor, while others saw them as a propaganda tool against the Russians. Whichever interpretation of the bombings one chooses, the Trinity test prior to them had irrevocably signaled an uncertain new era. Unbeknownst at the time, it became a means for ending one war and a symbol of a yet-undefined one — “the Cold War” — with the Soviet Union.

References:

Frank, David.  Downfall:  The End of the Imperial Japanese Empire.  Penguin Publishing, 2001.

Los Alamos National Laboratory History Homepage.  “Project Y.” n.d. <http://www.lanl.gov/history/atomicbomb/index.shtml> (6 June 2007)

McKain, Mark, ed. Making and Using the Atomic Bomb.  San Diego:  Greenhaven Press, 2003.

Rhodes, Richard.  The Making of the Atomic Bomb.  New York: Simon & Schuster, 1995.

Takaki, Ronald T. Hiroshima: Why America Dropped the Atomic Bomb.  Boston: Little, Brown, and Co., 1995.

©2023 Steve Sagarra

Saturday, December 31, 2022

For Old Times' Sake

After recently attending my latest high school reunion - like many events last few years, delayed and rescheduled due to the pandemic - two important lessons were realized. One, there is plenty yet to learn about your dearest, closest friends you may have known for decades. Two, we can haunt and torment ourselves for years with lamentable experiences and corrosive sentiments from our past that no one cares to recall or even remembers. Leaving behind the chaos and uncertainty that has consumed the world felt nice as we reminisced and reconnected. Seemed like cherished olden days that night without having missed a beat, if only for a moment.

What is particular, yet certainly not solely unique, to my graduating class is the diversity and camaraderie among us that has existed since at least junior high school if not beyond. That youthful period is when the majority of our extended friendships, and loves, ignited that still persist and thrive today. This is not to say that we exist in a vacuum without internal stratification. While each of us might have our specific groups, there always has been a consistent and harmonious intermingling, as personally experienced and observed, beyond those confines without prejudice of demographic or status.

Considering the multiverse idea, there are infinite possibilities for the unfolding of events and our lives. Theoretically, it also means you might not exist in at least one of them - a curiously fascinating idea, no matter how fortunate or unfortunate. We may take our ‘presence’ for granted with social media that has given us an unprecedented opportunity to engage with others without being physically present - as the world discovered and adapted to during the pandemic. Yet, like anything in life, there are limits to this modern social interaction that give a higher valuation to personal, face-to-face engagement.

A lesson for humanity in general, but I leave that to you to learn accordingly.

In 1922, the world was experiencing the early throes of the Jazz Age/Roaring Twenties that developed out of the devastating ashes of “the war to end all wars.” Given the decade’s cultural and social dynamism, the French called the period Années folles (“Crazy Years”) - a fitting, if not apropos, moniker that so far could be applied to the 2020s as well for its comparable shifts and upheavals of the status quo. Perhaps 100 years from now, another generation will reflect on not only their own time but also look back on this one. Wondering what it was all about, possibly seeking inspiration and guidance from its context in relation to their own circumstance.

What legacy is left to them, and the future that it will usher, is already decided even if it is yet to be written. As the calendar again turns from another year to the next, let us give them one to commemorate rather than one to deplore.

©2022 Steve Sagarra

Friday, October 21, 2022

Hollaback Twirl

For a recent movie/television writer position with a leading entertainment website, I was asked to briefly write about my favorite movie franchise. The following was my response, as well as submitting several previous blog posts as additional relevant writing samples.

To quote Brodie Bruce in Mallrats, "wow, that is a good question. Difficult, though; what does one gauge his response on?" A comic book showdown of Avengers vs Justice League? A scifi battle of Star Trek vs Star Wars? A well-tailored and lethally equipped James Bond vs all of them? Swinging in to take the top spot is Batman, specifically Christopher Nolan's The Dark Knight trilogy. While Tim Burton's 1989 film starring Michael Keaton succeeds in bringing to life the altruistic yet cavalier playboy Bruce Wayne and his gritty world's greatest detective alter ego for the first time, it cannot escape the campiness that defined the character for decades. Especially in the ensuing sequels, and, unfortunately, in hindsight. Nolan's version starring Christian Bale embraces the former while avoiding the latter - particularly in the definitive second film The Dark Knight, which quite possibly is one of the all-time finest movies ever produced - that elevates the cinematic superhero to new heights. Where it begins in the first movie, the Nolanverse rises to the occasion in the third and final act to create an enduring legacy.

Believe that to be a decent and efficient answer; yet, I never heard from them about the writer job. While applicants and new hires might be ghosting in today's job market, it is an all-too-common, widespread issue with potential employers as well.

©2022 Steve Sagarra