Apparently, we got it wrong concerning President Obama’s economic stance – he is not a socialist in capitalist clothing, rather a BIG BUSINESS capitalist in socialist clothing. How else to explain Wall Street receiving taxpayer money that Main Street has not? Meantime, taxpayers funding the bailout continue losing jobs and retirement nest eggs as these big business capitalists receive more capital, from an administration elected on the promise of “hope and change” for the nation's electorate. So much for the redistribution of wealth for those taxpayers – even the ones who voted for him – and the restructuring of the economic order.
Even more, Obama insists that another stimulus package is not yet needed, despite his own admission that his administration grossly underestimated the recession’s forecasted impact. While the president sees it as “pretty clear” that unemployment will continue to rise, it is even clearer where his administration stands on truly helping taxpayers – offering only empty rhetoric to encourage us to “tough it out” while giving our money to big business and wasteful government programs.
Obama Says Second Fiscal Stimulus Bill Not Yet Needed
Now how do you feel about the tax cuts – aimed at taxpayers, mind you – and the stimulus check received under the Bush Administration? Sounds pretty good, doesn’t it? Don’t expect any of that type of relief from the Obama Administration any time soon though.
Apparently, it just isn’t needed yet.
©2009 Steve Sagarra
Do you hate when you’re at a concert, and the band makes you participate? You’re there to enjoy yourself, relax or whatever, and next thing you’re being told to put your hands up, scream or punch a baby. Whatever it is, suddenly you’ve become part of their act, without so much as a farthing to show for the effort. But you do it don’t you, even if reluctantly?
Government likes to do the same thing. As I was raised and taught, democratic government is an institution formed and designated to lessen the burden and better facilitate collectively the tasks that individual citizens, and to that extent individual states, alone cannot do on their own. For the most part this has dealt with commerce and foreign relations, but has expanded to include everything from education to emergency services. In theory, it is not meant to intrude in every aspect of the lives of its citizens or to be used as a tool of fear. Fear tactics are reserved for tyrannical dictatorships – not a country founded on individual liberty – who oppress their people beyond the point of any realization that they are living in a state of fear.
There are many citizens who feel that this is the type of government we live under in the United States. Without getting into a political theory debate, this is far from the truth. Even if it does seem somewhat illusionary (or delusionary?), we actively participate in government at election time, even if reluctantly, by calling upon certain citizens drawn from our population to represent our common interests. Only those on the fringes see it as otherwise, either not enough involvement or too much intrusion.
The latest Iranian election, and the subsequent controversy, is a presumptuous contrast. For arguments sake, when George W. Bush “allegedly” stole the 2000 election – which anyone, like myself, who has actually read the U.S. Constitution knows is grossly inaccurate – there was massive outrage from Democrats. What happened? Eventually, the peaceful transition of power from one president to the next. And when the hotly contested 2008 election between John McCain and Barack Obama ended, what happened? Again, the peaceful transition of power from one president to the next. The system worked, for better or worse, as it has worked since 1789 – no mass riots by the opposition, no goon squads to oppress them.
Juxtaposed, Iran has seen nothing but mass protests and a crackdown on anyone opposed to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s allegedly fraudulent re-election. Sadly, it serves to illuminate the pseudo-nature of the world’s “democracies” in otherwise oppressive societies. Ahmadinejad is simply one of many world leaders who could be placed among the Mount Rushmore of dictators-in-disguise – the Castro brothers in Cuba, Bashar Al-Assad in Syria, Hugo Chavez in Venezuela. You know, the beacons of (totalitarian) hope and promise. (For the entire band, you could even include Kim “Wipe Out U.S. Imperialists” Jong-Il of North Korea.)
And the name of their band? Naturally, the “Axis of Evil”. They only play death metal, but they don’t care whether you participate in their act – they will play no matter how much you pump your fist or how loud you scream. However, they might like it if you punch a baby.
©2009 Steve Sagarra
